News
Crime
- [03/16] $70M in prescription drugs stolen in Conn. heist
- [03/15] More charges in alleged child-punching at Walmart
- [03/15] Acquittal in 2008 crash that killed Pa. lawmaker
Top Headlines
Case Summaries
Criminal Law & Procedure
[03/15] Dermer v. Miami-Dade County
In a First Amendment challenge to a county ordinance prohibiting any false statement concerning the contents or effect of any petition for initiative, referendum, or recall, partial summary judgment for plaintiff is reversed where: 1) plaintiff lacked standing to challenge the ordinance because he failed to submit any detail, such as when, where, or how he intended to exercise his right to free speech in the future, that illuminated the specifics of his claimed injury; and 2) plaintiff's claim was not ripe because his allegations contained no factual specificity and, therefore, did not demonstrate a credible threat of prosecution.
[03/15] US v. Frank
Defendant's conviction for traveling and engaging in illicit sexual conduct with minors is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress defendant's non-Mirandized statements to Cambodian officials because the statements did not fall under the joint venture doctrine; 2) 18 U.S.C. section 2251A applied extraterritorially to reach defendant's conduct; 3) defendant's statement that the minor girls came to his hotel "for the pictures and to have sex together," taken into account with the other evidence presented, allowed the jury to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant engaged in illicit sexual conduct; and 4) the term "purchase," as used in 18 U.S.C. section 2251A(b), covered situations where a defendant pays a minor directly for sex.
[03/11] Cole v. State of Florida
Conviction of defendant for two counts of first-degree murder, kidnapping and robbery, and sentence to death for each murder are affirmed where: 1) the trial court did not err in admonishing defense counsel for a cross-examination question to state's witness, a co-defendant, concerning the plea agreement; 2) the trial court did not err in admitting photographs of defendant and her co-defendants partying as it was relevant; 3) sufficient evidence exists to support defendant's first-degree murder convictions; 4) the trial court did not err in instructing the jury on, and in finding, the avoid-arrest and HAC aggravating factors; and 5) the sentences were proportionate and constitutional.
Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
